Prove a Coronavirus exists, Collect €€€

Seems simple enough . . .

Prove the Virus, Collect €€€

The Isolate Truth Fund is offering 1.5 million € (approx $1.5 million USD, $2 million CAD)

WE NOTICED . . .

All virologists have deceived themselves and the public when they claim the existence of disease-causing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.

Virologists inadvertently kill cells in test tubes, believing that this is proof of the presence and isolation of a virus. Only from fragments of dying cells do virologists mentally construct a gene sequence and pass it off as fact. Therefore, the test procedures do not offer any significance or meaning. Typical structures of dying cells in the electron microscope are passed off as viruses. Such structures could never be detected or recognized in a human being so far!

Well, actually they don’t do it mentally, but they do it using a computer, which is why it is called an in silico (computers are based on silicon) genome. They take the fragments of RNA and assemble them into a genome.

Why do they need to culture the virus in the lab? One answer I have heard is that because there are not enough viral particles. If we are walking virus replication machines, aren’t we the equivalent of a cell culture? What about those millions of particles we are trying to stop with a mask?

To sequence the genome of a biological entity you first need to isolate that entity, in other words separate that entity from all other things. Otherwise, how do you know the source of the RNA/DNA you are looking at? It could be from the patient sample, the fetal bovine serum or the monkey kidney cell that is added to the cell culture to ‘grow the virus’. It could be from yeast or bacteria or fungi or mold as even if they filter out larger particles like bacteria or yeast, there may still be genetic fragments present. How do we know the source of the fragments when all these other sources of genetic material have been added to the culture?

Even if they were not added and we had a sample from a patient, the same questions would still be outstanding. How do we know the source of the fragments? A sample from a patient is also likely to contain some combination of bacteria, yeast, mold and fungi and potentially many fragments from each.

The simple answer is to isolate full, intact strings of RNA/DNA and sequence them all. We are told viruses are an RNA strand in an envelope. How do we know this? Did we find them intact, or were they theorized to exist in that form?

Continuing from the Isolate Truth Fund website:

OUR GOAL

These misguided developments have distanced medicine far from the reality and understanding of true health. We would like to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of disease and health for all people.

I agree, molecular biology may be useful in learning and understanding many things, but when theory cannot be shown in reality we have a serious disconnect.

WE GUARANTEE:

1,5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a corona virus, including documented control experiments of all steps taken in the proof.

You’re on!

It will be easy, right? Any reputable lab can isolate and purify the virus and can replicate their procedure with a sample from any sick patient right?

Visit the site to claim your reward

Further commentary from the site:

1. Virologists interpret the death of cells in the laboratory as being caused by viruses. Due to a lack of control experiments, they overlook the fact that they kill the cells in the laboratory themselves and unintentionally, by starvation and poisoning. This misinterpretation is based on a single publication by John Franklin Enders and a colleague on 6/1/1954. This publication was ruled by the highest court in the measles virus trial to contain no evidence of a virus. This publication became the exclusive basis not only of measles virology, but of all virology since 1954 and of the Corona hysteria.

2. Virologists mentally/computationally assemble the shortest pieces of so-called genetic information of dying cells into a very long genetic strand, which they pass off as the genetic strand of a virus. This mental/computational process is called alignment. In doing so, they have not carried out the control experiments, the attempt to mentally/computationally construct the desired hereditary strand even from short pieces of so-called genetic information from non-infected sources.

3. Virologists always need a given genetic strand of a virus for the alignment of a virus. However, they always use a hereditary strand that has only been generated mentally/computationally and never a real one that has been found in reality. They never make thereby the control attempts whether from the available data set so-called hereditary information also "viral" hereditary substance strands of completely different viruses could be constructed or not.

4. Virologists have never seen or isolated "viruses" in humans, animals, plants and their fluids. They have done this only apparently, indirectly and always only by means of very special and artificial cell systems in the laboratory. They have never mentioned or documented the control attempts whether they have succeeded in the representation and the isolation of viruses also in and from humans, animals, plants or their liquids.

5. Virologists have never isolated those supposed viruses which they photograph by means of electron micrographs, characterized them biochemically or obtained their supposed genetic material from them. They have never performed or published control experiments to determine whether, after isolating these structures, "viral" proteins (the envelope of the virus) and, above all, the viral hereditary strand, which is supposed to be the central component and characteristic of a virus, could actually be detected.

6. Virologists pass off typical artifacts of dying tissues/cells and typical structures formed when cellular components such as proteins, lipids and the solvents used are swirled as viruses or as viral components. Again, control experiments with uninfected but equally treated cells/tissues are lacking.

7. The so-called transmission experiments, which virologists carry out to prove the transmissibility and pathogenicity of the presumed viruses, disprove the entire virology. It is quite obviously the experiments themselves that cause the symptoms that are passed off in animal experiments as proof of the existence and effect of the presumed viruses. Again, there is a lack of any control experiments in which exactly the same thing is done, merely with non-infected or sterilized materials.