At least since the days of Thomas Malthus, the debate has continued. Are there too many people, or not enough?
Thomas Malthus wrote a book called An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus saw population growth as inevitable whenever conditions improved. This may be the case in certain locations, but what we can observe in the world today is that population growth declines in industrialized nations. It has reached the point now that many countries have birth rates that are below the replacement rate which means that without immigration their populations will decline.
They will also be “top heavy” which refers to a vertical representation of age stratified population with the largest numbers of people in the upper age groups which are to be supported by the population in the lower age ranges.
Some see this as a desired outcome, some see it as leading to undesirable and very serious social effects.
Questions and Observations:
There are people who advocate population reduction, why?
To reduce the burden on the planet
To make it easier control the non-ruling classes
To make more resources available for those that remain
To reduce the financial burden on the State of care for those who do not
contribute whether that is due to age, illness, welfare fraud, etc.
There are those who warn of population collapse
Elon Musk: “I think the biggest problem the world will face in 20 years is population collapse”
Jordan Peterson: “I’ve thought for at least ten years that the biggest problem in fifty years is there is not enough people.“
What is the size of population that can be supported?
What are we willing to do to support that population?
What will population growth do to our economic systems?
What will population collapse do to our economic systems?
What would have to change to live in a state of stable population?
Population Reduction
Birth rates are below replacement level in industrialized nations. This means only immigration will keep the population stable. Immigration will only work to stabilize total population if birth rates exceed the replacement rate in the areas people are emigrating from. Otherwise overall population numbers will fall.
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, projections were made that this virus would kill millions. That didn’t happen.
When the quackcines (aka vaccines) were rolled out, projections were made that the quackcine would kill hundreds of millions. That didn’t happen. Or did it?
According the the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data, it has killed millions. Steve Kirsch has estimated the URF (Under reporting factor) of the VAERS to be anywhere from 30 to 100. This means the deaths due to quackcine could be anywhere from 360 to 150 million.
Is the background mortality rate higher than normal? With all the other effects the NPIs (non pharamceutical interventions) have had, it is hard to say, and also to say what the cause is.
Some of the conspiracy minded call the quackcines death shots and claim that the quackcines are part of a depopulation agenda.
In this substack, Covid Vaccines as the Aschen Agenda, Monica Hughes provides evidence that the quackcines are:
reproductively toxic, and that this effect may well be intentional.
Another excellent article here:
The History of Population Control is Important for Understanding COVID-19
Sterilization through vaccination has long been viewed as the holy grail of population control, as global faith in vaccination allows the covert mass administration of sterilizing substances, and unlike many other methods, in theory it only needs to be done once.
Part two here:
In recent times, the targeted demographic appears to have been expanded to include most of the Western population. Because of this, groups (that you, dear reader, likely belong to) that were not typically targeted for population reduction in the past now are. We are all the prey now.
Bill Gates has become the poster boy for the depopulation conspiracy theorists. In a series of videos found here: The Corbett Report Bill’s history with and connection to the eugenics movement is detailed. To give you an idea of the major themes covered, here the titles given to the individual videos that were subsequently combined into one:
Remember when Bill Gates wanted Windows on every desktop computer? Now it is a jab in every arm. Who is one of the world's biggest promoters of quackcination? Coincidence?
I have realized what he wants to do - apply a software patch to human immunity.
Ring, Ring.
Bill: Hello?
Reality: Bill, it doesn't work that way.
Bill hangs up phone and goes back to his web call with the WHO and big pHARMa planning the next pandemic and how to roll out the next quackcine.
There is plenty of evidence that there are people who want to reduce the population. The question is how many people will go along with it, support it or oppose it?