Great summary, thanks. These diehard germ theory hacks really are starting to embarrass themselves. They seem to lack the attention to detail and curiosity in the natural world to either understand or care about the arguments being made against their beliefs, because belief is all it is.
Yes, I think key issues are being highlighted. That doesn't necessarily mean a resolution is in sight, but when the same questions are asked over and over again, perhaps the lack of a straight forward answer will move the needle. If viruses were easily proven and beyond doubt, why doesn't one of the first papers make that abundantly clear? Why is it not clear two and a half years later?
It helps maintain momentum on this question that other issues like the measures taken, the censorship, etc. are casting the whole response into a state of doubt.
I have been on and off and then on and then back on germ theory and then finally decided to make the hop to Just terrain and I'm staying here. I am no scientist but I know bullshit when I smell it. Terrain just cannot be wrong as far as I'm concerned. When they can proven replication and transmission with a pure virus isolate, then maybe I'll consider changing my mind. Great article, very well put together. Thank you
If the virus exists and some/many/most people are asymptomatic and/or recover, terrain matters more than the virus.
If the virus does not exist, there are other causes of disease we are not investigating due to the assertion it is a virus and injecting people with questionable substances to prevent illness that they are not subject to.
I have always leaned towards terrain. After seeing the events of the last couple of years and the lack of a straight forward, logical answer on whether viruses exist, I am leaning further away from germ theory. If some new compelling evidence is presented I will review it, but so far the evidence on offer does not measure up.
I could have sworn i commented on this FABULOUS article. Thank you for compiling all the relevant material with links.
So Sin Lee is the SAME guy that Cowan has referenced in prior videos.... didn't Cowan say in older videos when describing this encounter him & Andy had that this guy was a Wuhan/CDC virologist??? Doesn't that alone sort of challenge his integrity? 😂
Also, I read this gem last night from Northern Tracey (shes brilliant, if you don't already follow her, you should check her out). I dont know how I missed this document in the past, but I found it quite fascinating.
If it is the same person, in this video https://www.bitchute.com/video/eWwCKrKofzke/ Tom describes him as "introduced to us as having 20 years as a Senior Laboratory Virologist at the Wuhan's Chinese Centre for Disease Control and 20 years Senior Pathologist doing virological laboratory work at Yale University. He was there to debunk us. Tom and Andy are nuts".
Oh! Also also. I know you & I were having a go at Steve Kirsch, (I know I need to change my user name to something less, well "anonymous". when I first signed up for Substack, I never intended to keep using it lol)
Anyway, I found this in one of the replies and I laughed my ass off. Is he having a stroke?
Max
20 hr ago
I would love seeing a group of unbiased researchers performing the steps described. As I said, I don't have money to bet anything or finance such work. But someone else could. Those are logic and necessary steps, I believe.
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse

Steve Kirsch
18 hr agoAuthor
That is not how science works. Science does not prescribe a specific method to make a specific determination.
Um..... WHAT!?!?!?!?! 😂😂😂😂😂 FUCKS SAKE! Hes lost it.
Yes, Steve feels already has the truth and doesn't think the logical and methodological flaws we point out are valid. No wonder we are in the situation we are in if he is representative of the virus as an infective agent viewpoint. We have a photograph, what else could it be?
mRNA was discovered by the Soviets in the early 1980s, but they didn't dare to use it, because it starts an uncontrollable chain reaction. It's quite unlikely it's being used in public, but it's an excellent red herring:
Great summary, thanks. These diehard germ theory hacks really are starting to embarrass themselves. They seem to lack the attention to detail and curiosity in the natural world to either understand or care about the arguments being made against their beliefs, because belief is all it is.
Yes, I think key issues are being highlighted. That doesn't necessarily mean a resolution is in sight, but when the same questions are asked over and over again, perhaps the lack of a straight forward answer will move the needle. If viruses were easily proven and beyond doubt, why doesn't one of the first papers make that abundantly clear? Why is it not clear two and a half years later?
It helps maintain momentum on this question that other issues like the measures taken, the censorship, etc. are casting the whole response into a state of doubt.
I have been on and off and then on and then back on germ theory and then finally decided to make the hop to Just terrain and I'm staying here. I am no scientist but I know bullshit when I smell it. Terrain just cannot be wrong as far as I'm concerned. When they can proven replication and transmission with a pure virus isolate, then maybe I'll consider changing my mind. Great article, very well put together. Thank you
Yes, terrain matters.
If the virus exists and some/many/most people are asymptomatic and/or recover, terrain matters more than the virus.
If the virus does not exist, there are other causes of disease we are not investigating due to the assertion it is a virus and injecting people with questionable substances to prevent illness that they are not subject to.
I have always leaned towards terrain. After seeing the events of the last couple of years and the lack of a straight forward, logical answer on whether viruses exist, I am leaning further away from germ theory. If some new compelling evidence is presented I will review it, but so far the evidence on offer does not measure up.
I could have sworn i commented on this FABULOUS article. Thank you for compiling all the relevant material with links.
So Sin Lee is the SAME guy that Cowan has referenced in prior videos.... didn't Cowan say in older videos when describing this encounter him & Andy had that this guy was a Wuhan/CDC virologist??? Doesn't that alone sort of challenge his integrity? 😂
Also, I read this gem last night from Northern Tracey (shes brilliant, if you don't already follow her, you should check her out). I dont know how I missed this document in the past, but I found it quite fascinating.
https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Measles-Control-Experiment-told-by-the-head-of-an-independent-laboratory-in-Germany.pdf
If it is the same person, in this video https://www.bitchute.com/video/eWwCKrKofzke/ Tom describes him as "introduced to us as having 20 years as a Senior Laboratory Virologist at the Wuhan's Chinese Centre for Disease Control and 20 years Senior Pathologist doing virological laboratory work at Yale University. He was there to debunk us. Tom and Andy are nuts".
YES!!!!! That is the exact description I was thinking of. Just didn't have time this morning to dig. I had been wanting to confirm this, so thank you!
Unreal! Gotta give Tom & Andy credit though for being willing to engage these people.... and not lose their cool 😂
Oh! Also also. I know you & I were having a go at Steve Kirsch, (I know I need to change my user name to something less, well "anonymous". when I first signed up for Substack, I never intended to keep using it lol)
Anyway, I found this in one of the replies and I laughed my ass off. Is he having a stroke?
Max
20 hr ago
I would love seeing a group of unbiased researchers performing the steps described. As I said, I don't have money to bet anything or finance such work. But someone else could. Those are logic and necessary steps, I believe.
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse

Steve Kirsch
18 hr agoAuthor
That is not how science works. Science does not prescribe a specific method to make a specific determination.
Um..... WHAT!?!?!?!?! 😂😂😂😂😂 FUCKS SAKE! Hes lost it.
Yes, Steve feels already has the truth and doesn't think the logical and methodological flaws we point out are valid. No wonder we are in the situation we are in if he is representative of the virus as an infective agent viewpoint. We have a photograph, what else could it be?
Northern Tracey's blog, in case ya don't already have it bookmarked
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/home/
Looks like some great articles, thanks!
mRNA was discovered by the Soviets in the early 1980s, but they didn't dare to use it, because it starts an uncontrollable chain reaction. It's quite unlikely it's being used in public, but it's an excellent red herring:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna