There's another similarity between AIDS and Convid-19: the so-called treatments have "side" effects identical to the alleged disease (e.g. the destruction of the immune system by AZT, a chemotherapeutic agent but too toxic even for that use, or the many Convid jab deaths being called "Covid"). It's a very dangerous characteristic, because it is a death spiral of more poisonous treatments for disease X, more "disease X" invocations to hide the effects of the poisonous treatments, more demand for poisonous treatments to treat the rising rates of alleged disease X -- lather, rinse, repeat.
With every virus type (strain), there occur mutations of that viral type by cells. This leads to subtypes, called variants, which occur when cells alter their genomic protein blueprints. This can occur when cells encounter a type of toxic tissue that they cannot readily remove via normal cellular endocytosis due to its poisonous toxicity. If the toxin is new to the cell, which is usually the case in our ever-increasing toxic world, where new toxins are created daily, the cell must minutely change its protein synthesis in order to manufacture solvent proteins of a specific nature to deal with them. In part, variants occur due to this.
As well, for each new set of viruses created by cells (normally arising after 48 to 72 hours, as the old set 'dies' out), the 2nd set created by cells (if needed) will naturally be slightly different in their genome, thus, their sequence will be altered in small segments of the original genome of the first virus that appeared—the entire sequence will not be changed. Therefore, endless amounts of viral variants can exist since each body and the cells therein contain their own specific protein creation ideally manufactured for a particular body, and no one else.
The more people you test, the more sequences you will find.
Whether SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally occurring virus or not, this principle is still true throughout the virome/virus kingdom. There is no doubt, to me personally, that coronaviruses are indeed naturally occurring viruses arising from the inhalation of toxins, including the ingestion of toxins, making their way to the lungs, which are then attempted to be expelled via the lungs—a major detoxification pathway.
If there was no solvent factor involved in the body to turn non-bioactive toxins into a soluble form to then be expelled or dissolved from the body, there would be no likelihood to survive to this point in time with our ever-increasing industrial toxicity over the past 100 years. As such, the more toxic we become, the more we need viral solvents to help dissolve toxins that accumulate in our bodies, especially with the reduction of bacterial levels due to the lack of consuming proper raw animal foods.
Bacterial and parasitical levels have decreased alongside this increase in toxicity. Bacteria are the first line of defense against normal bioactive toxins that the body encounters. When our bacterial and parasitical cleansers die off and/or are heavily reduced due to poisonous non-bioactive toxins, the only thing cells can use to cleanse are viruses. Viruses are the only thing that is widely and rapidly replicated by cells in a short period of time that can account for this solvent factor and subsequent increase in expulsion symptoms—nothing else.
Also, this focus on the idea that a virus cannot be called 'virus', unless it causes disease, is mostly pointless. It helps tremendously to understand why researchers would assume that viruses are presumed to cause disease, and the errors therein. Their past errors of observation have mainly occurred because health and disease are a complex picture in totality. In actuality, viruses can indeed be considered a type of toxin/chemical themselves, which are produced by cells as a survival mechanism to cleanse. The word 'virus' does not have to indicate pathogenicity, which suggests indiscriminate pathogenic actions, which science itself now admits is not the case with viruses.
Above all, even if you were to change the name from 'virus' to something else, the same particles that science claims are contagious, are the very same particles that are produced by cells during states of disease in order to cleanse. Those that do not believe these particles even exist and are created by intelligent cells, are literally throwing the baby out with the bath water and disregarding the needs of the tissue of the body entirely, as well disregarding the modes and functions of the detoxification system.
It is not easy to study these particles, as lab culture cannot replicate the bodily environment.
They are also making their observations through the lens of germ theory, rather than just making observations to see where they lead.
Your explanation of variants makes more sense to me than the dominant narrative. If they were to sequence these viruses and find them to be a genetic match in some way to the body making them, that would provide evidence to support the endogenous virus view, but they are not seeking to show that.
I think such evidence would be more valuable than the Virus Challenge proposed by what you refer to as the Kaufman gang. It would least start to point research in a direction which would be more helpful in the long run, as virology as it stands feeds vaccinology, which is going in the wrong direction. Such evidence would begin to turn attention to the terrain model which is where it should be as the germ theory paradigm has been of no benefit to those of us seeking health.
I agree with that. We should also realize that in the disease state, you will observe what appears to be pathogenicity taking place in the breakdown of cells by viruses, especially in culture. I contend strongly that this is illusory, and all scientific evidence agrees with that assessment. We must realize how researchers are missing this key part of the puzzle when observing entities outside the body and realize the potential for human error.
Some have pointed to Lanka's control experiments as proof that any cell under duress will produce the same particles that researchers call viruses. However, Lanka did not show through his experiment any cohesive particle as has been shown by researchers for nearly 100 years. He showed cell debris.
If you take cells out of the body, or, culture HeLa type cells, you will have eventual cell breakdown since cells are not regulated in a complex microbiome; there is no respiration (sweat), liver, kidneys, bowels, or cleansers like phagocytes, bacteria, or parasites, to move toxins away from cells. The only thing a cell has in culture are the solvents manufactured by those cells (virus).
Cell debris and viral cohesive structure are two separate things. Cell debris is not structured in form. It is chaotic. Viruses are very structured and mathematical in form. For example, icosahedral viruses have 20 faces and 12 fibril shafts (spikes). Not coincidentally, this form requires the least amount of energy by the cell to produce, is functionally stable, and is also more resistant to toxins and chemicals. In fact, all the literature states that viruses of these forms are very resilient and can withstand much assault, including during isolation and culturing.
There is a whole wealth of information concerning viruses and their structure, and it would be denialism to disregard that information. Science itself, contrary to what many think due to mainstream media, admits the power and vital need for viruses.
It is my assertion that viruses in culture will infect almost all cells due to their instability and that such cells will be partially or fully dissolved by their own (viral) solvents when not properly regulated by a body and its excretion pathways. One way we can know this is by observing the culture itself. If viruses were merely cellular debris, you would not see the exponential growth of viral colonies spreading out from the cell and multiplying in size, which you can see with the naked eye.
What you see in culture is the production of extra material, which are viruses, and are produced by cells as they utilize growth medium to synthesize viruses until cell death (apoptosis). Mere cell debris does not spread out like that—it does not grow in order of magnitude. With viruses, you see the creation of something extra, as the cell is producing energy and material from food to try to save itself. Because of this, you see the massive growth of viral colonies much larger than the cells themselves.
And another thought, below where Mary asks Mike the implications, he says in point #2. ‘We are not looking at air pollution, glyphosate, polluted waters, EMFs, the medicines we take, it shuts all this conversation down and puts the focus on something we need to fear.’ ---We should be looking at the outside causes of toxicity and thus disease in the body to which the body’s cells respond with viral dissolving of such toxins… Fear not! 😊
When he says "We" I take that to be mainstream medicine. Of course there are those who study the effects of toxins but medicine has not given it much attention yet. Either it will, or a new paradigm will rise to take its place once enough people reject the germ theory based world view and medical approach.
Yes, they pile assumptions on top of each other. They have two hurdles to jump over. Show us the particle AND show us that it causes disease. No evidence for either that I and many other researchers can find. As many who have been covering this topic far longer than I have say, it wasn't proven with HIV and here we are again with SARS-CoV-2. Similar scenario, (only larger scale now) different particle to blame.
In your section 'Sequencing of the Virus', the statement: 'Now that is curious. If SARS-CoV-2 is entering our cells and replicating, why are there so many sequences reported?'
Viruses are not entering from the outside as invaders, but are made by our own cells and each person will have their own DNA/RNA specific variants being made, as needed to rid of toxicity, thus innumerable possibilities of sequences!
The view of invading viruses has a long history and is a barrier to overcome. If it could be shown that the variants are genetically linked to each person, then there would be progress towards the view that viruses are made internally, on purpose.
Yes, they have chosen to question the quackcines rather than ask the question of whether there is a threat that quackcines are said to address. The have to take one step further back.
I like the analogy in Bill Huston's latest post about being enough of a detective to find the true culprit and cause of death - the knife aka the syringe sticking out of a body or the butler aka the fear of a non-existent virus who plunged it into the body.
There's another similarity between AIDS and Convid-19: the so-called treatments have "side" effects identical to the alleged disease (e.g. the destruction of the immune system by AZT, a chemotherapeutic agent but too toxic even for that use, or the many Convid jab deaths being called "Covid"). It's a very dangerous characteristic, because it is a death spiral of more poisonous treatments for disease X, more "disease X" invocations to hide the effects of the poisonous treatments, more demand for poisonous treatments to treat the rising rates of alleged disease X -- lather, rinse, repeat.
With every virus type (strain), there occur mutations of that viral type by cells. This leads to subtypes, called variants, which occur when cells alter their genomic protein blueprints. This can occur when cells encounter a type of toxic tissue that they cannot readily remove via normal cellular endocytosis due to its poisonous toxicity. If the toxin is new to the cell, which is usually the case in our ever-increasing toxic world, where new toxins are created daily, the cell must minutely change its protein synthesis in order to manufacture solvent proteins of a specific nature to deal with them. In part, variants occur due to this.
As well, for each new set of viruses created by cells (normally arising after 48 to 72 hours, as the old set 'dies' out), the 2nd set created by cells (if needed) will naturally be slightly different in their genome, thus, their sequence will be altered in small segments of the original genome of the first virus that appeared—the entire sequence will not be changed. Therefore, endless amounts of viral variants can exist since each body and the cells therein contain their own specific protein creation ideally manufactured for a particular body, and no one else.
The more people you test, the more sequences you will find.
Whether SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally occurring virus or not, this principle is still true throughout the virome/virus kingdom. There is no doubt, to me personally, that coronaviruses are indeed naturally occurring viruses arising from the inhalation of toxins, including the ingestion of toxins, making their way to the lungs, which are then attempted to be expelled via the lungs—a major detoxification pathway.
If there was no solvent factor involved in the body to turn non-bioactive toxins into a soluble form to then be expelled or dissolved from the body, there would be no likelihood to survive to this point in time with our ever-increasing industrial toxicity over the past 100 years. As such, the more toxic we become, the more we need viral solvents to help dissolve toxins that accumulate in our bodies, especially with the reduction of bacterial levels due to the lack of consuming proper raw animal foods.
Bacterial and parasitical levels have decreased alongside this increase in toxicity. Bacteria are the first line of defense against normal bioactive toxins that the body encounters. When our bacterial and parasitical cleansers die off and/or are heavily reduced due to poisonous non-bioactive toxins, the only thing cells can use to cleanse are viruses. Viruses are the only thing that is widely and rapidly replicated by cells in a short period of time that can account for this solvent factor and subsequent increase in expulsion symptoms—nothing else.
Also, this focus on the idea that a virus cannot be called 'virus', unless it causes disease, is mostly pointless. It helps tremendously to understand why researchers would assume that viruses are presumed to cause disease, and the errors therein. Their past errors of observation have mainly occurred because health and disease are a complex picture in totality. In actuality, viruses can indeed be considered a type of toxin/chemical themselves, which are produced by cells as a survival mechanism to cleanse. The word 'virus' does not have to indicate pathogenicity, which suggests indiscriminate pathogenic actions, which science itself now admits is not the case with viruses.
I proved this in my article here: https://jeffgreenhealth.substack.com/p/science-confirms-my-writings-on-viruses
Above all, even if you were to change the name from 'virus' to something else, the same particles that science claims are contagious, are the very same particles that are produced by cells during states of disease in order to cleanse. Those that do not believe these particles even exist and are created by intelligent cells, are literally throwing the baby out with the bath water and disregarding the needs of the tissue of the body entirely, as well disregarding the modes and functions of the detoxification system.
Thanks for your explanation.
It is not easy to study these particles, as lab culture cannot replicate the bodily environment.
They are also making their observations through the lens of germ theory, rather than just making observations to see where they lead.
Your explanation of variants makes more sense to me than the dominant narrative. If they were to sequence these viruses and find them to be a genetic match in some way to the body making them, that would provide evidence to support the endogenous virus view, but they are not seeking to show that.
I think such evidence would be more valuable than the Virus Challenge proposed by what you refer to as the Kaufman gang. It would least start to point research in a direction which would be more helpful in the long run, as virology as it stands feeds vaccinology, which is going in the wrong direction. Such evidence would begin to turn attention to the terrain model which is where it should be as the germ theory paradigm has been of no benefit to those of us seeking health.
I agree with that. We should also realize that in the disease state, you will observe what appears to be pathogenicity taking place in the breakdown of cells by viruses, especially in culture. I contend strongly that this is illusory, and all scientific evidence agrees with that assessment. We must realize how researchers are missing this key part of the puzzle when observing entities outside the body and realize the potential for human error.
Some have pointed to Lanka's control experiments as proof that any cell under duress will produce the same particles that researchers call viruses. However, Lanka did not show through his experiment any cohesive particle as has been shown by researchers for nearly 100 years. He showed cell debris.
If you take cells out of the body, or, culture HeLa type cells, you will have eventual cell breakdown since cells are not regulated in a complex microbiome; there is no respiration (sweat), liver, kidneys, bowels, or cleansers like phagocytes, bacteria, or parasites, to move toxins away from cells. The only thing a cell has in culture are the solvents manufactured by those cells (virus).
Cell debris and viral cohesive structure are two separate things. Cell debris is not structured in form. It is chaotic. Viruses are very structured and mathematical in form. For example, icosahedral viruses have 20 faces and 12 fibril shafts (spikes). Not coincidentally, this form requires the least amount of energy by the cell to produce, is functionally stable, and is also more resistant to toxins and chemicals. In fact, all the literature states that viruses of these forms are very resilient and can withstand much assault, including during isolation and culturing.
There is a whole wealth of information concerning viruses and their structure, and it would be denialism to disregard that information. Science itself, contrary to what many think due to mainstream media, admits the power and vital need for viruses.
It is my assertion that viruses in culture will infect almost all cells due to their instability and that such cells will be partially or fully dissolved by their own (viral) solvents when not properly regulated by a body and its excretion pathways. One way we can know this is by observing the culture itself. If viruses were merely cellular debris, you would not see the exponential growth of viral colonies spreading out from the cell and multiplying in size, which you can see with the naked eye.
What you see in culture is the production of extra material, which are viruses, and are produced by cells as they utilize growth medium to synthesize viruses until cell death (apoptosis). Mere cell debris does not spread out like that—it does not grow in order of magnitude. With viruses, you see the creation of something extra, as the cell is producing energy and material from food to try to save itself. Because of this, you see the massive growth of viral colonies much larger than the cells themselves.
And another thought, below where Mary asks Mike the implications, he says in point #2. ‘We are not looking at air pollution, glyphosate, polluted waters, EMFs, the medicines we take, it shuts all this conversation down and puts the focus on something we need to fear.’ ---We should be looking at the outside causes of toxicity and thus disease in the body to which the body’s cells respond with viral dissolving of such toxins… Fear not! 😊
When he says "We" I take that to be mainstream medicine. Of course there are those who study the effects of toxins but medicine has not given it much attention yet. Either it will, or a new paradigm will rise to take its place once enough people reject the germ theory based world view and medical approach.
If a particle does not cause disease, then it is not, by definition, a "virus".
A particle may exist, but not cause disease. This would mean it is not a virus.
The narrative we are supposed to buy into, is that this specific particle exists, so therefore it causes disease.
Bad form.
Yes, they pile assumptions on top of each other. They have two hurdles to jump over. Show us the particle AND show us that it causes disease. No evidence for either that I and many other researchers can find. As many who have been covering this topic far longer than I have say, it wasn't proven with HIV and here we are again with SARS-CoV-2. Similar scenario, (only larger scale now) different particle to blame.
Yes, the "invisible" particle. And we must believe it is what is causing disease, without a shred of evidence. What a crappy scam.
In your section 'Sequencing of the Virus', the statement: 'Now that is curious. If SARS-CoV-2 is entering our cells and replicating, why are there so many sequences reported?'
Viruses are not entering from the outside as invaders, but are made by our own cells and each person will have their own DNA/RNA specific variants being made, as needed to rid of toxicity, thus innumerable possibilities of sequences!
The view of invading viruses has a long history and is a barrier to overcome. If it could be shown that the variants are genetically linked to each person, then there would be progress towards the view that viruses are made internally, on purpose.
It’s so funny, even ‘science’ says viruses are non-living. So how would viruses ‘know’ to invade?! 😑
yeah I agree, they clearly are taking a position, and have described viruses and their effects many times.
Yes, they have chosen to question the quackcines rather than ask the question of whether there is a threat that quackcines are said to address. The have to take one step further back.
I like the analogy in Bill Huston's latest post about being enough of a detective to find the true culprit and cause of death - the knife aka the syringe sticking out of a body or the butler aka the fear of a non-existent virus who plunged it into the body.