15 Comments

There's another similarity between AIDS and Convid-19: the so-called treatments have "side" effects identical to the alleged disease (e.g. the destruction of the immune system by AZT, a chemotherapeutic agent but too toxic even for that use, or the many Convid jab deaths being called "Covid"). It's a very dangerous characteristic, because it is a death spiral of more poisonous treatments for disease X, more "disease X" invocations to hide the effects of the poisonous treatments, more demand for poisonous treatments to treat the rising rates of alleged disease X -- lather, rinse, repeat.

Expand full comment

With every virus type (strain), there occur mutations of that viral type by cells. This leads to subtypes, called variants, which occur when cells alter their genomic protein blueprints. This can occur when cells encounter a type of toxic tissue that they cannot readily remove via normal cellular endocytosis due to its poisonous toxicity. If the toxin is new to the cell, which is usually the case in our ever-increasing toxic world, where new toxins are created daily, the cell must minutely change its protein synthesis in order to manufacture solvent proteins of a specific nature to deal with them. In part, variants occur due to this.

As well, for each new set of viruses created by cells (normally arising after 48 to 72 hours, as the old set 'dies' out), the 2nd set created by cells (if needed) will naturally be slightly different in their genome, thus, their sequence will be altered in small segments of the original genome of the first virus that appeared—the entire sequence will not be changed. Therefore, endless amounts of viral variants can exist since each body and the cells therein contain their own specific protein creation ideally manufactured for a particular body, and no one else.

The more people you test, the more sequences you will find.

Whether SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally occurring virus or not, this principle is still true throughout the virome/virus kingdom. There is no doubt, to me personally, that coronaviruses are indeed naturally occurring viruses arising from the inhalation of toxins, including the ingestion of toxins, making their way to the lungs, which are then attempted to be expelled via the lungs—a major detoxification pathway.

If there was no solvent factor involved in the body to turn non-bioactive toxins into a soluble form to then be expelled or dissolved from the body, there would be no likelihood to survive to this point in time with our ever-increasing industrial toxicity over the past 100 years. As such, the more toxic we become, the more we need viral solvents to help dissolve toxins that accumulate in our bodies, especially with the reduction of bacterial levels due to the lack of consuming proper raw animal foods.

Bacterial and parasitical levels have decreased alongside this increase in toxicity. Bacteria are the first line of defense against normal bioactive toxins that the body encounters. When our bacterial and parasitical cleansers die off and/or are heavily reduced due to poisonous non-bioactive toxins, the only thing cells can use to cleanse are viruses. Viruses are the only thing that is widely and rapidly replicated by cells in a short period of time that can account for this solvent factor and subsequent increase in expulsion symptoms—nothing else.

Also, this focus on the idea that a virus cannot be called 'virus', unless it causes disease, is mostly pointless. It helps tremendously to understand why researchers would assume that viruses are presumed to cause disease, and the errors therein. Their past errors of observation have mainly occurred because health and disease are a complex picture in totality. In actuality, viruses can indeed be considered a type of toxin/chemical themselves, which are produced by cells as a survival mechanism to cleanse. The word 'virus' does not have to indicate pathogenicity, which suggests indiscriminate pathogenic actions, which science itself now admits is not the case with viruses.

I proved this in my article here: https://jeffgreenhealth.substack.com/p/science-confirms-my-writings-on-viruses

Above all, even if you were to change the name from 'virus' to something else, the same particles that science claims are contagious, are the very same particles that are produced by cells during states of disease in order to cleanse. Those that do not believe these particles even exist and are created by intelligent cells, are literally throwing the baby out with the bath water and disregarding the needs of the tissue of the body entirely, as well disregarding the modes and functions of the detoxification system.

Expand full comment
Oct 7, 2022Liked by Brian

And another thought, below where Mary asks Mike the implications, he says in point #2. ‘We are not looking at air pollution, glyphosate, polluted waters, EMFs, the medicines we take, it shuts all this conversation down and puts the focus on something we need to fear.’ ---We should be looking at the outside causes of toxicity and thus disease in the body to which the body’s cells respond with viral dissolving of such toxins… Fear not! 😊

Expand full comment

If a particle does not cause disease, then it is not, by definition, a "virus".

A particle may exist, but not cause disease. This would mean it is not a virus.

The narrative we are supposed to buy into, is that this specific particle exists, so therefore it causes disease.

Bad form.

Expand full comment

In your section 'Sequencing of the Virus', the statement: 'Now that is curious. If SARS-CoV-2 is entering our cells and replicating, why are there so many sequences reported?'

Viruses are not entering from the outside as invaders, but are made by our own cells and each person will have their own DNA/RNA specific variants being made, as needed to rid of toxicity, thus innumerable possibilities of sequences!

Expand full comment

yeah I agree, they clearly are taking a position, and have described viruses and their effects many times.

Expand full comment