The laziness and lack of attention to detail at the heart of virology is something to behold. But then again, given their hero Pasteur was a fraud, it’s hardly surprising.
Hey Brian, here is some leisurely reading for you covering several of the flaws of that PCR test of which you write: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ --- the method simply detects short RNA segments, not whole intact virus, and really should only be considered as a piece of a whole clinical picture that the patient is presenting with, not standing in a parking lot line to get swabbed... And since when have we ever made such drastic decisions/mandates on the back of ONE LAB test?!?! More like we are following the science fiction!
Yup, as just about all "viruses," this one also exists only in computer simulations and on TV. While there are no "infectious viruses," the TV versions do seem to attach the leftover minds of those, who overdo the watching. By overdoing, I mean, more than 15 seconds in a lifetime. :)
The laziness and lack of attention to detail at the heart of virology is something to behold. But then again, given their hero Pasteur was a fraud, it’s hardly surprising.
Hey Brian, here is some leisurely reading for you covering several of the flaws of that PCR test of which you write: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ --- the method simply detects short RNA segments, not whole intact virus, and really should only be considered as a piece of a whole clinical picture that the patient is presenting with, not standing in a parking lot line to get swabbed... And since when have we ever made such drastic decisions/mandates on the back of ONE LAB test?!?! More like we are following the science fiction!
Yup, as just about all "viruses," this one also exists only in computer simulations and on TV. While there are no "infectious viruses," the TV versions do seem to attach the leftover minds of those, who overdo the watching. By overdoing, I mean, more than 15 seconds in a lifetime. :)