The following is a quote from Vincent Racaniello, a virologist:
"Virus isolate is a very basic term that implies nothing except that the virus was isolated from an infected host."
This is his website: https://www.virology.ws/2021/02/25/understanding-virus-isolates-variants-strains-and-more/
I think it is important to make note of the number of assumptions that are being made in proposing the infectious virus narrative:
Assumption #1. Something very small has made this person sick.
Assumption #2. Viruses exist as fragments of genetic material, perhaps with a protein coat.
Assumption #3. The virus was in the host.
Assumption #4: The virus is not an exosome or other structure created by the body
Assumption #5: The host contracted the virus from another host which means the virus can remain intact outside the body
Assumption #6. The virus or foreign genetic fragment was not identified and discarded by the body
Assumption #7. The cells of the body allowed the virus to enter the interior of the cell (was infected).
Assumption #8. The fragments can cause illness because they compel the cells in the body to act as factories, like a photocopier that operates until it destroys itself
This whole chain of reasoning falls if we cannot identify a particle proposed in Assumption #1, Something very small has made this person sick.
There is another assumption that virology is based on that could cast doubt on the entire field:
Assumption #9: What is observed in the laboratory gives us knowledge about what happens in the human body.
How can we know this? The human body and the lab are entirely different environments. How can we know if what we observe in the lab has any relevance to processes in the human body?
Many of us grew up accepting the virus narrative. Looking at it now, that is a rather large list of assumptions one must make to accept the narrative, but we don’t have to examine each of them if the particle that is alleged to start this process cannot be separated from other particles and studied, if that is even possible.
It is possible there is no virus in the host.
It is possible the viruses are made by the body on purpose. See my previous post on Viruses as Solvents / Soap in which case the person is in the process of detoxification and/or healing.
It is possible the host is ill for some other reason.
If they say they know the host is infected with SARS-CoV2, how can they know that if the particle has not been identified first? This is circular logic, i.e. the premise assumes the conclusion. How can any test be created without first identifying what one is testing for?
According to virology, an isolate is the mixture they make by adding the patient sample, the fetal bovine serum, the antibiotic(s) and perhaps trypsin (an enzyme) to the cell culture. They are assuming a virus is contained in the cell culture.
There may be:
a virus,
parts of a virus
no virus
no parts of virus.
They have not separated out a virus particle so that they can then sequence its genome or use it for further testing. What they give to animals in testing is this mixture that they call isolation of the virus. How can we know if it is the mixture itself or a component of the mixture that causes illness, if any is observed?
Science is about reducing variables, not adding them.
For Part I in the Virus Isolation series, click here
For other posts relating to Quackcines or Viruses click here
Great post! Finally someone with common sense!
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-a-virus