Viruses may exist but are they pathogenic and transmissible? They are many professionals with education far beyond mine who are asking for proof, and that what is offered now is assumption and supposition, not science. The same story with HIV, where is the proof that it exists and causes AIDS.
Regarding functionally, disease can be explained in other ways without having to rely on a virus as cause. Doing so avoids taking responsibility for the these other causes and leads us down the wrong path.
It is clear to me that terrain is more important than germ but cannot be mandated or manipulated like the virus narrative is.
I see he was involved with the B & M Gates Foundation in vaccine research, so he has made assumptions that viruses are real and vaccines help. He is an inventor and patent holder on vaccines, so many reasons to be highly skeptical of his views.
I don't see his paper, so if you have a title or link please share.
I will guess that viruses do exist
That is after reading
Geert vanden bossche
Did I finally spell his name correctly?
Check his substack to find his 45 page paper
Might be more important than the RFKjr but Geert is biomedical chemical and the real sat-anthony Fauci is legal perspective and both mandatory reads
Thanks, I will check it out. Do you have a title or link. He has a lot of posts.
I don't want to guess whether viruses exist, I want it to be clearly established, like the evidence for bacteria.
I understand
To me they exist functionally if not in reality
Music is sounds, can also be
In a silent way...the silences
Dis ease virome or genome?
I mean, terrain or germ?
Analog or digital?
How does the way we perceive affect what we percepted
My word for the day
Percepted
What exactly did we perceive?
Regards, blessings
Viruses may exist but are they pathogenic and transmissible? They are many professionals with education far beyond mine who are asking for proof, and that what is offered now is assumption and supposition, not science. The same story with HIV, where is the proof that it exists and causes AIDS.
Regarding functionally, disease can be explained in other ways without having to rely on a virus as cause. Doing so avoids taking responsibility for the these other causes and leads us down the wrong path.
It is clear to me that terrain is more important than germ but cannot be mandated or manipulated like the virus narrative is.
I see he was involved with the B & M Gates Foundation in vaccine research, so he has made assumptions that viruses are real and vaccines help. He is an inventor and patent holder on vaccines, so many reasons to be highly skeptical of his views.
I don't see his paper, so if you have a title or link please share.
Geert vanden bossche
Substack
Latest article predictions
Link to full paper in the substack
Forgot how to do this on my phone
Suggest read full paper and diagrams
Lmk if you need more
Above should get you there