30 Comments
Jun 24, 2022·edited Jun 24, 2022Liked by Brian

Excellent,

I think we know why they must use abnormal monkey cells- they cannot make the effects called 'isolation' by using normal human ones. 'HIV' can only be grown in culture by stressing abnormal cells in a certain way. Kinda says all we need to know.

Jo

Expand full comment

Thanks for taking on this spicy topic. The saying "If you assume it makes an ASS out of U and ME" comes to mind whenever I consider the scientific credentials of our germ inverters. And to assume that deliberately poisoned, dying cell cultures can be analysed in the same way as living cells might be the most grave assumption of our modern era.

Expand full comment

This is the best presented argument I've seen, just simple facts and questions.

Great! Thank you.

Expand full comment
Jun 24, 2022·edited Jun 24, 2022Liked by Brian

THANK YOU for this insightful data! We really need to stop tearing people up for saying it's not been "isolated". This game has become like a game of Faucism, where the definitions of the words are changed in order to defend narratives. It's sad to see those who purport to want to stop this madness dismissing others who are only pointing directly to the FACTS.

I was frustrated when I saw this happening with the "snake venom" battle. So I looked up the patents and the papers, wanting to get to the bottom of it for myself. And sure enough, I located the "venom" (the active and destructive enzymes and peptides produced BY SNAKES) and confirmed they're inside of the new jabs. And worse, the mRNA is causing the victims to endlessly replicate these neurotoxins, along with the spike proteins. Even more disturbing, (if that's possible) is that there's no "off" switch built into this process. How are we going to turn this new coding OFF at some point? Will we ever be ABLE to do this?

So jabbed people are continuously producing what is essentially snake venom. But this is purportedly "debunked" because it's not sourced directly from snakes;-) I have to wonder if the victims can eventually become desensitized to what their own bodies are producing, to the point unvaccinated people are more immediately sensitive to it than the jabbed people are? Could their sweat glands literally be attempting to excrete the toxins, and so their clothing, bedding, and everything they touch could be a source of exposure for others?

I've begun to notice VERY immediate symptoms after close contact with vaccinated people, but maybe I'm just paranoid. This entire thing is so fully messed up. I find it fascinating that I'm actually HAVING conversations about such things! It's a horror show, and truly the worst one anyone could've cooked up.

Expand full comment

It would be fine to use abnormal cells if the controls they used also treated the cells in the same way, ie added cytotoxic antibiotics and starved the culture, but they don't. According to basic school girl lessons and the scientific method any effects seen and any subsequent experiments must be completely disregarded if appropriate controls are not used.

Jo

Expand full comment

Has any virologist answered these questions? I have more about the genetic sequencing. I've read some say that the pieces of RNA have a pattern. Doesn't provide a cause, but may prove correlation to some common exposure?

What are all the pieces of RNA and DNA being sold as viruses? What about plant viruses and megaviruses? Have those been isolated and purified?

Expand full comment

This is a REALLY FANTASTIC argument!!! Such GREAT INFORMATION!!! Thank you!

Expand full comment